Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Gambling Managers Salary: Illinois vs New Jersey

Gambling Managers earn a median of $75,990 in Illinois and $106,140 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $30,150 (-28.4%), with New Jersey paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$75,990
Illinois median
$76,022 after COL
$106,140
New Jersey median
$97,551 after COL
-28.4%
Nominal gap
New Jersey leads
-22.1%
Adjusted gap
New Jersey leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Jersey pays $30,150 more per year than Illinois for gambling managers, a gap of +28.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Jersey still comes out ahead, with roughly $21,529 of extra purchasing power (+22.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for gambling managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Gambling Managers

Illinois

Median salary
$75,990
Mean salary
$80,920
Employment
230
Location quotient
1.29
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$76,022
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Managers page for Illinois →

Gambling Managers

New Jersey

Median salary
$106,140
Mean salary
$123,390
Employment
150
Location quotient
1.21
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$97,551
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Managers page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into gambling managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.