Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Gambling Managers Salary: Washington vs Wisconsin

Gambling Managers earn a median of $121,800 in Washington and $107,700 in Wisconsin. That is a nominal gap of $14,100 (+13.1%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$121,800
Washington median
$113,818 after COL
$107,700
Wisconsin median
$114,459 after COL
+13.1%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-0.6%
Adjusted gap
Wisconsin leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $14,100 more per year than Wisconsin for gambling managers, a gap of +13.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Wisconsin actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $641 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.6% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for gambling managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Gambling Managers

Washington

Median salary
$121,800
Mean salary
$123,300
Employment
120
Location quotient
1.11
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$113,818
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Managers page for Washington →

Gambling Managers

Wisconsin

Median salary
$107,700
Mean salary
$107,360
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.38
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$114,459
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Managers page for Wisconsin →

Related pages

Keep digging into gambling managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.