Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Gambling Service Workers, All Other Salary: Alaska vs Illinois

Gambling Service Workers, All Other earn a median of $36,650 in Alaska and $46,840 in Illinois. That is a nominal gap of $10,190 (-21.8%), with Illinois paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$36,650
Alaska median
$35,805 after COL
$46,840
Illinois median
$46,860 after COL
-21.8%
Nominal gap
Illinois leads
-23.6%
Adjusted gap
Illinois leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Illinois pays $10,190 more per year than Alaska for gambling service workers, all other, a gap of +21.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Illinois still comes out ahead, with roughly $11,054 of extra purchasing power (+23.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for gambling service workers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Gambling Service Workers, All Other

Alaska

Median salary
$36,650
Mean salary
$35,250
Employment
910
Location quotient
29.43
Jobs per 1,000
2.8
COL-adjusted median
$35,805
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Service Workers, All Other page for Alaska →

Gambling Service Workers, All Other

Illinois

Median salary
$46,840
Mean salary
$43,130
Employment
340
Location quotient
0.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$46,860
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Service Workers, All Other page for Illinois →

Related pages

Keep digging into gambling service workers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.