Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

General And Operations Managers Salary: California vs Washington

General And Operations Managers earn a median of $125,240 in California and $130,240 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $5,000 (-3.8%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$125,240
California median
$113,114 after COL
$130,240
Washington median
$121,705 after COL
-3.8%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-7.1%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $5,000 more per year than California for general and operations managers, a gap of +3.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,591 of extra purchasing power (+7.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for general and operations managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

General And Operations Managers

California

Median salary
$125,240
Mean salary
$163,330
Employment
292,300
Location quotient
0.70
Jobs per 1,000
16.2
COL-adjusted median
$113,114
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full General And Operations Managers page for California →

General And Operations Managers

Washington

Median salary
$130,240
Mean salary
$157,840
Employment
53,800
Location quotient
0.65
Jobs per 1,000
15.2
COL-adjusted median
$121,705
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full General And Operations Managers page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into general and operations managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.