Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Graphic Designers Salary: Nevada vs Massachusetts

Graphic Designers earn a median of $57,180 in Nevada and $76,370 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $19,190 (-25.1%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$57,180
Nevada median
$57,192 after COL
$76,370
Massachusetts median
$72,213 after COL
-25.1%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-20.8%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $19,190 more per year than Nevada for graphic designers, a gap of +25.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $15,021 of extra purchasing power (+20.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for graphic designers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Graphic Designers

Nevada

Median salary
$57,180
Mean salary
$58,770
Employment
1,970
Location quotient
0.93
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$57,192
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Graphic Designers page for Nevada →

Graphic Designers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$76,370
Mean salary
$80,030
Employment
4,890
Location quotient
0.97
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$72,213
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Graphic Designers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into graphic designers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.