Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Helpers--Extraction Workers Salary: Oregon vs Indiana

Helpers--Extraction Workers earn a median of $45,760 in Oregon and $59,990 in Indiana. That is a nominal gap of $14,230 (-23.7%), with Indiana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$45,760
Oregon median
$44,272 after COL
$59,990
Indiana median
$64,278 after COL
-23.7%
Nominal gap
Indiana leads
-31.1%
Adjusted gap
Indiana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Indiana pays $14,230 more per year than Oregon for helpers--extraction workers, a gap of +23.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Indiana still comes out ahead, with roughly $20,006 of extra purchasing power (+31.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for helpers--extraction workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Helpers--Extraction Workers

Oregon

Median salary
$45,760
Mean salary
$48,720
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.67
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$44,272
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Helpers--Extraction Workers page for Oregon →

Helpers--Extraction Workers

Indiana

Median salary
$59,990
Mean salary
$59,920
Employment
130
Location quotient
0.91
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$64,278
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Helpers--Extraction Workers page for Indiana →

Related pages

Keep digging into helpers--extraction workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.