Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Helpers--Production Workers Salary: Maine vs Wisconsin

Helpers--Production Workers earn a median of $42,070 in Maine and $43,690 in Wisconsin. That is a nominal gap of $1,620 (-3.7%), with Wisconsin paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$42,070
Maine median
$43,349 after COL
$43,690
Wisconsin median
$46,432 after COL
-3.7%
Nominal gap
Wisconsin leads
-6.6%
Adjusted gap
Wisconsin leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Wisconsin pays $1,620 more per year than Maine for helpers--production workers, a gap of +3.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Wisconsin still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,083 of extra purchasing power (+6.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for helpers--production workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Helpers--Production Workers

Maine

Median salary
$42,070
Mean salary
$44,020
Employment
550
Location quotient
0.80
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$43,349
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Helpers--Production Workers page for Maine →

Helpers--Production Workers

Wisconsin

Median salary
$43,690
Mean salary
$43,400
Employment
4,300
Location quotient
1.35
Jobs per 1,000
1.5
COL-adjusted median
$46,432
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Helpers--Production Workers page for Wisconsin →

Related pages

Keep digging into helpers--production workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.