Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Helpers--Production Workers Salary: Wyoming vs Washington

Helpers--Production Workers earn a median of $40,040 in Wyoming and $43,720 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $3,680 (-8.4%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$40,040
Wyoming median
$43,197 after COL
$43,720
Washington median
$40,855 after COL
-8.4%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+5.7%
Adjusted gap
Wyoming leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $3,680 more per year than Wyoming for helpers--production workers, a gap of +8.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Wyoming actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,342 more in national-price-level terms (a +5.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for helpers--production workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Helpers--Production Workers

Wyoming

Median salary
$40,040
Mean salary
$46,710
Employment
260
Location quotient
0.86
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$43,197
Regional Price Parity
92.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Helpers--Production Workers page for Wyoming →

Helpers--Production Workers

Washington

Median salary
$43,720
Mean salary
$46,000
Employment
3,900
Location quotient
1.01
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$40,855
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Helpers--Production Workers page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into helpers--production workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.