Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Highway Maintenance Workers Salary: Minnesota vs Washington

Highway Maintenance Workers earn a median of $60,900 in Minnesota and $63,420 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $2,520 (-4.0%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$60,900
Minnesota median
$61,752 after COL
$63,420
Washington median
$59,264 after COL
-4.0%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+4.2%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $2,520 more per year than Minnesota for highway maintenance workers, a gap of +4.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Minnesota actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,488 more in national-price-level terms (a +4.2% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for highway maintenance workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Highway Maintenance Workers

Minnesota

Median salary
$60,900
Mean salary
$59,550
Employment
3,860
Location quotient
1.34
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$61,752
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Highway Maintenance Workers page for Minnesota →

Highway Maintenance Workers

Washington

Median salary
$63,420
Mean salary
$65,110
Employment
2,620
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$59,264
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Highway Maintenance Workers page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into highway maintenance workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.