Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

History Teachers, Postsecondary Salary: Illinois vs Rhode Island

History Teachers, Postsecondary earn a median of $84,620 in Illinois and $106,240 in Rhode Island. That is a nominal gap of $21,620 (-20.4%), with Rhode Island paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$84,620
Illinois median
$84,656 after COL
$106,240
Rhode Island median
$103,872 after COL
-20.4%
Nominal gap
Rhode Island leads
-18.5%
Adjusted gap
Rhode Island leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Rhode Island pays $21,620 more per year than Illinois for history teachers, postsecondary, a gap of +20.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Rhode Island still comes out ahead, with roughly $19,216 of extra purchasing power (+18.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for history teachers, postsecondary in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

History Teachers, Postsecondary

Illinois

Median salary
$84,620
Mean salary
$90,260
Employment
630
Location quotient
0.81
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$84,656
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full History Teachers, Postsecondary page for Illinois →

History Teachers, Postsecondary

Rhode Island

Median salary
$106,240
Mean salary
$119,030
Employment
150
Location quotient
2.29
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$103,872
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full History Teachers, Postsecondary page for Rhode Island →

Related pages

Keep digging into history teachers, postsecondary from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.