Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Industrial Engineers Salary: Texas vs California

Industrial Engineers earn a median of $103,430 in Texas and $123,070 in California. That is a nominal gap of $19,640 (-16.0%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$103,430
Texas median
$106,566 after COL
$123,070
California median
$111,154 after COL
-16.0%
Nominal gap
California leads
-4.1%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $19,640 more per year than Texas for industrial engineers, a gap of +16.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,588 of extra purchasing power (+4.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for industrial engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Industrial Engineers

Texas

Median salary
$103,430
Mean salary
$112,250
Employment
29,620
Location quotient
0.94
Jobs per 1,000
2.1
COL-adjusted median
$106,566
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Industrial Engineers page for Texas →

Industrial Engineers

California

Median salary
$123,070
Mean salary
$127,280
Employment
25,830
Location quotient
0.63
Jobs per 1,000
1.4
COL-adjusted median
$111,154
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Industrial Engineers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into industrial engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.