Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Instructional Coordinators Salary: Idaho vs Maryland

Instructional Coordinators earn a median of $54,260 in Idaho and $95,570 in Maryland. That is a nominal gap of $41,310 (-43.2%), with Maryland paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$54,260
Idaho median
$56,820 after COL
$95,570
Maryland median
$91,055 after COL
-43.2%
Nominal gap
Maryland leads
-37.6%
Adjusted gap
Maryland leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maryland pays $41,310 more per year than Idaho for instructional coordinators, a gap of +43.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maryland still comes out ahead, with roughly $34,234 of extra purchasing power (+37.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for instructional coordinators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Instructional Coordinators

Idaho

Median salary
$54,260
Mean salary
$60,180
Employment
2,200
Location quotient
1.91
Jobs per 1,000
2.6
COL-adjusted median
$56,820
Regional Price Parity
95.5%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Instructional Coordinators page for Idaho →

Instructional Coordinators

Maryland

Median salary
$95,570
Mean salary
$95,520
Employment
3,040
Location quotient
0.81
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$91,055
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Instructional Coordinators page for Maryland →

Related pages

Keep digging into instructional coordinators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.