Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Instructional Coordinators Salary: Wisconsin vs Connecticut

Instructional Coordinators earn a median of $81,550 in Wisconsin and $95,560 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $14,010 (-14.7%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$81,550
Wisconsin median
$86,668 after COL
$95,560
Connecticut median
$92,230 after COL
-14.7%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-6.0%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $14,010 more per year than Wisconsin for instructional coordinators, a gap of +14.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,563 of extra purchasing power (+6.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for instructional coordinators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Instructional Coordinators

Wisconsin

Median salary
$81,550
Mean salary
$87,060
Employment
1,780
Location quotient
0.45
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$86,668
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Instructional Coordinators page for Wisconsin →

Instructional Coordinators

Connecticut

Median salary
$95,560
Mean salary
$95,550
Employment
1,670
Location quotient
0.72
Jobs per 1,000
1.0
COL-adjusted median
$92,230
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Instructional Coordinators page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into instructional coordinators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.