Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Insulation Workers, Mechanical Salary: Virginia vs Nevada

Insulation Workers, Mechanical earn a median of $56,440 in Virginia and $106,840 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $50,400 (-47.2%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$56,440
Virginia median
$55,824 after COL
$106,840
Nevada median
$106,862 after COL
-47.2%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-47.8%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $50,400 more per year than Virginia for insulation workers, mechanical, a gap of +47.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Nevada still comes out ahead, with roughly $51,039 of extra purchasing power (+47.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for insulation workers, mechanical in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Insulation Workers, Mechanical

Virginia

Median salary
$56,440
Mean salary
$54,940
Employment
950
Location quotient
1.41
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$55,824
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Insulation Workers, Mechanical page for Virginia →

Insulation Workers, Mechanical

Nevada

Median salary
$106,840
Mean salary
$90,520
Employment
290
Location quotient
1.15
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$106,862
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Insulation Workers, Mechanical page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into insulation workers, mechanical from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.