Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Insurance Underwriters Salary: Massachusetts vs Colorado

Insurance Underwriters earn a median of $100,050 in Massachusetts and $100,050 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $0 (+0.0%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$100,050
Massachusetts median
$94,604 after COL
$100,050
Colorado median
$97,087 after COL
+0.0%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-2.6%
Adjusted gap
Colorado leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $0 more per year than Colorado for insurance underwriters, a gap of +0.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Colorado actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,483 more in national-price-level terms (a +2.6% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for insurance underwriters in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Insurance Underwriters

Massachusetts

Median salary
$100,050
Mean salary
$105,050
Employment
3,440
Location quotient
1.35
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$94,604
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Insurance Underwriters page for Massachusetts →

Insurance Underwriters

Colorado

Median salary
$100,050
Mean salary
$116,140
Employment
1,540
Location quotient
0.76
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$97,087
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Insurance Underwriters page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into insurance underwriters from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.