Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Interpreters And Translators Salary: Utah vs Washington

Interpreters And Translators earn a median of $65,990 in Utah and $69,620 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $3,630 (-5.2%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$65,990
Utah median
$66,748 after COL
$69,620
Washington median
$65,058 after COL
-5.2%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+2.6%
Adjusted gap
Utah leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $3,630 more per year than Utah for interpreters and translators, a gap of +5.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Utah actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,691 more in national-price-level terms (a +2.6% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for interpreters and translators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Interpreters And Translators

Utah

Median salary
$65,990
Mean salary
$66,120
Employment
690
Location quotient
1.16
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$66,748
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Interpreters And Translators page for Utah →

Interpreters And Translators

Washington

Median salary
$69,620
Mean salary
$72,720
Employment
1,620
Location quotient
1.32
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$65,058
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Interpreters And Translators page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into interpreters and translators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.