Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Interpreters And Translators Salary: Wyoming vs New York

Interpreters And Translators earn a median of $57,700 in Wyoming and $84,650 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $26,950 (-31.8%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$57,700
Wyoming median
$62,250 after COL
$84,650
New York median
$78,437 after COL
-31.8%
Nominal gap
New York leads
-20.6%
Adjusted gap
New York leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $26,950 more per year than Wyoming for interpreters and translators, a gap of +31.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New York still comes out ahead, with roughly $16,187 of extra purchasing power (+20.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for interpreters and translators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Interpreters And Translators

Wyoming

Median salary
$57,700
Mean salary
$51,400
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.31
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$62,250
Regional Price Parity
92.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Interpreters And Translators page for Wyoming →

Interpreters And Translators

New York

Median salary
$84,650
Mean salary
$86,810
Employment
3,650
Location quotient
1.11
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$78,437
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Interpreters And Translators page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into interpreters and translators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.