Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Labor Relations Specialists Salary: West Virginia vs Alaska

Labor Relations Specialists earn a median of $96,410 in West Virginia and $124,770 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $28,360 (-22.7%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$96,410
West Virginia median
$107,724 after COL
$124,770
Alaska median
$121,895 after COL
-22.7%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-11.6%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $28,360 more per year than West Virginia for labor relations specialists, a gap of +22.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $14,170 of extra purchasing power (+11.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for labor relations specialists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Labor Relations Specialists

West Virginia

Median salary
$96,410
Mean salary
$94,330
Employment
430
Location quotient
1.46
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$107,724
Regional Price Parity
89.5%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Labor Relations Specialists page for West Virginia →

Labor Relations Specialists

Alaska

Median salary
$124,770
Mean salary
$109,660
Employment
150
Location quotient
1.13
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$121,895
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Labor Relations Specialists page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into labor relations specialists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.