Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Landscape Architects Salary: Connecticut vs North Dakota

Landscape Architects earn a median of $85,370 in Connecticut and $91,250 in North Dakota. That is a nominal gap of $5,880 (-6.4%), with North Dakota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$85,370
Connecticut median
$82,396 after COL
$91,250
North Dakota median
$102,575 after COL
-6.4%
Nominal gap
North Dakota leads
-19.7%
Adjusted gap
North Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, North Dakota pays $5,880 more per year than Connecticut for landscape architects, a gap of +6.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, North Dakota still comes out ahead, with roughly $20,180 of extra purchasing power (+19.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for landscape architects in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Landscape Architects

Connecticut

Median salary
$85,370
Mean salary
$92,150
Employment
300
Location quotient
1.41
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$82,396
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Landscape Architects page for Connecticut →

Landscape Architects

North Dakota

Median salary
$91,250
Mean salary
$86,410
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$102,575
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Landscape Architects page for North Dakota →

Related pages

Keep digging into landscape architects from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.