Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Landscape Architects Salary: Texas vs Maryland

Landscape Architects earn a median of $81,110 in Texas and $86,390 in Maryland. That is a nominal gap of $5,280 (-6.1%), with Maryland paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$81,110
Texas median
$83,569 after COL
$86,390
Maryland median
$82,308 after COL
-6.1%
Nominal gap
Maryland leads
+1.5%
Adjusted gap
Texas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maryland pays $5,280 more per year than Texas for landscape architects, a gap of +6.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Texas actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,261 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for landscape architects in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Landscape Architects

Texas

Median salary
$81,110
Mean salary
$81,340
Employment
1,170
Location quotient
0.67
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$83,569
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Landscape Architects page for Texas →

Landscape Architects

Maryland

Median salary
$86,390
Mean salary
$89,330
Employment
530
Location quotient
1.51
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$82,308
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Landscape Architects page for Maryland →

Related pages

Keep digging into landscape architects from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.