Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Landscape Architects Salary: Tulsa, OK vs Reno, NV

Landscape Architects earn a median of $62,280 in Tulsa, OK and $105,050 in Reno, NV. That is a nominal gap of $42,770 (-40.7%), with Reno, NV paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$62,280
Tulsa, OK median
$69,810 after COL
$105,050
Reno, NV median
$103,995 after COL
-40.7%
Nominal gap
Reno, NV leads
-32.9%
Adjusted gap
Reno, NV leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Reno, NV pays $42,770 more per year than Tulsa, OK for landscape architects, a gap of +40.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Reno, NV still comes out ahead, with roughly $34,186 of extra purchasing power (+32.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for landscape architects in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Landscape Architects

Tulsa, OK

Median salary
$62,280
Mean salary
$64,010
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$69,810
Regional Price Parity
89.2%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Landscape Architects page for Tulsa, OK →

Landscape Architects

Reno, NV

Median salary
$105,050
Mean salary
$91,100
Employment
40
Location quotient
1.20
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$103,995
Regional Price Parity
101.0%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Landscape Architects page for Reno, NV →

Related pages

Keep digging into landscape architects from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.