Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Law Teachers, Postsecondary Salary: Utah vs Michigan

Law Teachers, Postsecondary earn a median of $138,020 in Utah and $167,560 in Michigan. That is a nominal gap of $29,540 (-17.6%), with Michigan paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$138,020
Utah median
$139,606 after COL
$167,560
Michigan median
$174,148 after COL
-17.6%
Nominal gap
Michigan leads
-19.8%
Adjusted gap
Michigan leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Michigan pays $29,540 more per year than Utah for law teachers, postsecondary, a gap of +17.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Michigan still comes out ahead, with roughly $34,542 of extra purchasing power (+19.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for law teachers, postsecondary in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Law Teachers, Postsecondary

Utah

Median salary
$138,020
Mean salary
$157,220
Employment
100
Location quotient
0.41
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$139,606
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Law Teachers, Postsecondary page for Utah →

Law Teachers, Postsecondary

Michigan

Median salary
$167,560
Mean salary
$173,710
Employment
350
Location quotient
0.53
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$174,148
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Law Teachers, Postsecondary page for Michigan →

Related pages

Keep digging into law teachers, postsecondary from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.