Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Lawyers Salary: Great Falls, MT vs Vallejo, CA

Lawyers earn a median of $93,920 in Great Falls, MT and $196,980 in Vallejo, CA. That is a nominal gap of $103,060 (-52.3%), with Vallejo, CA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$93,920
Great Falls, MT median
$96,980 after COL
$196,980
Vallejo, CA median
$181,584 after COL
-52.3%
Nominal gap
Vallejo, CA leads
-46.6%
Adjusted gap
Vallejo, CA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vallejo, CA pays $103,060 more per year than Great Falls, MT for lawyers, a gap of +52.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vallejo, CA still comes out ahead, with roughly $84,604 of extra purchasing power (+46.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for lawyers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Lawyers

Great Falls, MT

Median salary
$93,920
Mean salary
$98,150
Employment
120
Location quotient
0.66
Jobs per 1,000
3.2
COL-adjusted median
$96,980
Regional Price Parity
96.8%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Lawyers page for Great Falls, MT →

Lawyers

Vallejo, CA

Median salary
$196,980
Mean salary
$188,420
Employment
150
Location quotient
0.21
Jobs per 1,000
1.0
COL-adjusted median
$181,584
Regional Price Parity
108.5%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Lawyers page for Vallejo, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into lawyers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.