Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Legislators Salary: Montana vs New York

Legislators earn a median of $50,710 in Montana and $97,050 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $46,340 (-47.7%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$50,710
Montana median
$53,579 after COL
$97,050
New York median
$89,927 after COL
-47.7%
Nominal gap
New York leads
-40.4%
Adjusted gap
New York leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $46,340 more per year than Montana for legislators, a gap of +47.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New York still comes out ahead, with roughly $36,348 of extra purchasing power (+40.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for legislators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Legislators

Montana

Median salary
$50,710
Mean salary
$61,870
Employment
440
Location quotient
5.02
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$53,579
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Legislators page for Montana →

Legislators

New York

Median salary
$97,050
Mean salary
$120,330
Employment
1,440
Location quotient
0.88
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$89,927
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Legislators page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into legislators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.