Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Light Truck Drivers Salary: Texas vs Arizona

Light Truck Drivers earn a median of $40,760 in Texas and $47,910 in Arizona. That is a nominal gap of $7,150 (-14.9%), with Arizona paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$40,760
Texas median
$41,996 after COL
$47,910
Arizona median
$47,588 after COL
-14.9%
Nominal gap
Arizona leads
-11.8%
Adjusted gap
Arizona leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Arizona pays $7,150 more per year than Texas for light truck drivers, a gap of +14.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Arizona still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,592 of extra purchasing power (+11.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for light truck drivers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Light Truck Drivers

Texas

Median salary
$40,760
Mean salary
$46,470
Employment
71,660
Location quotient
0.80
Jobs per 1,000
5.2
COL-adjusted median
$41,996
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Light Truck Drivers page for Texas →

Light Truck Drivers

Arizona

Median salary
$47,910
Mean salary
$51,450
Employment
18,100
Location quotient
0.88
Jobs per 1,000
5.7
COL-adjusted median
$47,588
Regional Price Parity
100.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Light Truck Drivers page for Arizona →

Related pages

Keep digging into light truck drivers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.