Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Loan Interviewers And Clerks Salary: Texas vs Connecticut

Loan Interviewers And Clerks earn a median of $49,180 in Texas and $57,680 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $8,500 (-14.7%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,180
Texas median
$50,671 after COL
$57,680
Connecticut median
$55,670 after COL
-14.7%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-9.0%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $8,500 more per year than Texas for loan interviewers and clerks, a gap of +14.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,999 of extra purchasing power (+9.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for loan interviewers and clerks in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Loan Interviewers And Clerks

Texas

Median salary
$49,180
Mean salary
$51,030
Employment
20,940
Location quotient
1.35
Jobs per 1,000
1.5
COL-adjusted median
$50,671
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Loan Interviewers And Clerks page for Texas →

Loan Interviewers And Clerks

Connecticut

Median salary
$57,680
Mean salary
$56,850
Employment
1,170
Location quotient
0.62
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$55,670
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Loan Interviewers And Clerks page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into loan interviewers and clerks from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.