Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Locomotive Engineers Salary: Arkansas vs Oklahoma

Locomotive Engineers earn a median of $77,010 in Arkansas and $86,520 in Oklahoma. That is a nominal gap of $9,510 (-11.0%), with Oklahoma paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$77,010
Arkansas median
$88,581 after COL
$86,520
Oklahoma median
$98,494 after COL
-11.0%
Nominal gap
Oklahoma leads
-10.1%
Adjusted gap
Oklahoma leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oklahoma pays $9,510 more per year than Arkansas for locomotive engineers, a gap of +11.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oklahoma still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,913 of extra purchasing power (+10.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for locomotive engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Locomotive Engineers

Arkansas

Median salary
$77,010
Mean salary
$75,220
Employment
700
Location quotient
2.63
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$88,581
Regional Price Parity
86.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Locomotive Engineers page for Arkansas →

Locomotive Engineers

Oklahoma

Median salary
$86,520
Mean salary
$84,570
Employment
330
Location quotient
0.93
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$98,494
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Locomotive Engineers page for Oklahoma →

Related pages

Keep digging into locomotive engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.