Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Logging Workers, All Other Salary: Oregon vs Washington

Logging Workers, All Other earn a median of $59,110 in Oregon and $66,850 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $7,740 (-11.6%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$59,110
Oregon median
$57,188 after COL
$66,850
Washington median
$62,469 after COL
-11.6%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-8.5%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $7,740 more per year than Oregon for logging workers, all other, a gap of +11.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,281 of extra purchasing power (+8.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for logging workers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Logging Workers, All Other

Oregon

Median salary
$59,110
Mean salary
$56,700
Employment
700
Location quotient
25.31
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$57,188
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Logging Workers, All Other page for Oregon →

Logging Workers, All Other

Washington

Median salary
$66,850
Mean salary
$70,680
Employment
240
Location quotient
4.83
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$62,469
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Logging Workers, All Other page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into logging workers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.