Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Machine Feeders And Offbearers Salary: Oregon vs Wisconsin

Machine Feeders And Offbearers earn a median of $45,590 in Oregon and $47,470 in Wisconsin. That is a nominal gap of $1,880 (-4.0%), with Wisconsin paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$45,590
Oregon median
$44,108 after COL
$47,470
Wisconsin median
$50,449 after COL
-4.0%
Nominal gap
Wisconsin leads
-12.6%
Adjusted gap
Wisconsin leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Wisconsin pays $1,880 more per year than Oregon for machine feeders and offbearers, a gap of +4.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Wisconsin still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,341 of extra purchasing power (+12.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for machine feeders and offbearers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Machine Feeders And Offbearers

Oregon

Median salary
$45,590
Mean salary
$45,240
Employment
2,390
Location quotient
4.02
Jobs per 1,000
1.2
COL-adjusted median
$44,108
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Machine Feeders And Offbearers page for Oregon →

Machine Feeders And Offbearers

Wisconsin

Median salary
$47,470
Mean salary
$47,500
Employment
450
Location quotient
0.51
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$50,449
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Machine Feeders And Offbearers page for Wisconsin →

Related pages

Keep digging into machine feeders and offbearers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.