Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Machinists Salary: Florida vs Massachusetts

Machinists earn a median of $50,570 in Florida and $62,420 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $11,850 (-19.0%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$50,570
Florida median
$48,901 after COL
$62,420
Massachusetts median
$59,022 after COL
-19.0%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-17.1%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $11,850 more per year than Florida for machinists, a gap of +19.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,122 of extra purchasing power (+17.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for machinists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Machinists

Florida

Median salary
$50,570
Mean salary
$53,320
Employment
8,240
Location quotient
0.43
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$48,901
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Machinists page for Florida →

Machinists

Massachusetts

Median salary
$62,420
Mean salary
$65,140
Employment
7,870
Location quotient
1.12
Jobs per 1,000
2.2
COL-adjusted median
$59,022
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Machinists page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into machinists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.