Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Machinists Salary: Massachusetts vs Oregon

Machinists earn a median of $62,420 in Massachusetts and $62,120 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $300 (+0.5%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$62,420
Massachusetts median
$59,022 after COL
$62,120
Oregon median
$60,100 after COL
+0.5%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-1.8%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $300 more per year than Oregon for machinists, a gap of +0.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Oregon actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,078 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for machinists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Machinists

Massachusetts

Median salary
$62,420
Mean salary
$65,140
Employment
7,870
Location quotient
1.12
Jobs per 1,000
2.2
COL-adjusted median
$59,022
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Machinists page for Massachusetts →

Machinists

Oregon

Median salary
$62,120
Mean salary
$62,260
Employment
3,220
Location quotient
0.84
Jobs per 1,000
1.6
COL-adjusted median
$60,100
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Machinists page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into machinists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.