Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists Salary: Oklahoma vs Delaware

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists earn a median of $82,870 in Oklahoma and $106,070 in Delaware. That is a nominal gap of $23,200 (-21.9%), with Delaware paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$82,870
Oklahoma median
$94,339 after COL
$106,070
Delaware median
$106,274 after COL
-21.9%
Nominal gap
Delaware leads
-11.2%
Adjusted gap
Delaware leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Delaware pays $23,200 more per year than Oklahoma for magnetic resonance imaging technologists, a gap of +21.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Delaware still comes out ahead, with roughly $11,935 of extra purchasing power (+11.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for magnetic resonance imaging technologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists

Oklahoma

Median salary
$82,870
Mean salary
$82,880
Employment
360
Location quotient
0.78
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$94,339
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists page for Oklahoma →

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists

Delaware

Median salary
$106,070
Mean salary
$100,430
Employment
180
Location quotient
1.37
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$106,274
Regional Price Parity
99.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists page for Delaware →

Related pages

Keep digging into magnetic resonance imaging technologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.