Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Maintenance Workers, Machinery Salary: Tennessee vs Alaska

Maintenance Workers, Machinery earn a median of $64,980 in Tennessee and $75,670 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $10,690 (-14.1%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$64,980
Tennessee median
$70,730 after COL
$75,670
Alaska median
$73,926 after COL
-14.1%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-4.3%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $10,690 more per year than Tennessee for maintenance workers, machinery, a gap of +14.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,196 of extra purchasing power (+4.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for maintenance workers, machinery in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Maintenance Workers, Machinery

Tennessee

Median salary
$64,980
Mean salary
$63,400
Employment
1,400
Location quotient
1.17
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$70,730
Regional Price Parity
91.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Maintenance Workers, Machinery page for Tennessee →

Maintenance Workers, Machinery

Alaska

Median salary
$75,670
Mean salary
$74,400
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.47
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$73,926
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Maintenance Workers, Machinery page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into maintenance workers, machinery from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.