Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Management Analysts Salary: North Dakota vs District of Columbia

Management Analysts earn a median of $73,080 in North Dakota and $125,500 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $52,420 (-41.8%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$73,080
North Dakota median
$82,150 after COL
$125,500
District of Columbia median
$114,194 after COL
-41.8%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
-28.1%
Adjusted gap
District of Columbia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $52,420 more per year than North Dakota for management analysts, a gap of +41.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, District of Columbia still comes out ahead, with roughly $32,043 of extra purchasing power (+28.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for management analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Management Analysts

North Dakota

Median salary
$73,080
Mean salary
$88,880
Employment
1,080
Location quotient
0.44
Jobs per 1,000
2.6
COL-adjusted median
$82,150
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Management Analysts page for North Dakota →

Management Analysts

District of Columbia

Median salary
$125,500
Mean salary
$127,540
Employment
20,330
Location quotient
4.95
Jobs per 1,000
28.7
COL-adjusted median
$114,194
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Management Analysts page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into management analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.