Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Management Analysts Salary: Vermont vs Illinois

Management Analysts earn a median of $115,840 in Vermont and $110,370 in Illinois. That is a nominal gap of $5,470 (+5.0%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$115,840
Vermont median
$118,255 after COL
$110,370
Illinois median
$110,416 after COL
+5.0%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
+7.1%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $5,470 more per year than Illinois for management analysts, a gap of +5.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,838 of extra purchasing power (+7.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for management analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Management Analysts

Vermont

Median salary
$115,840
Mean salary
$121,870
Employment
970
Location quotient
0.55
Jobs per 1,000
3.2
COL-adjusted median
$118,255
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Management Analysts page for Vermont →

Management Analysts

Illinois

Median salary
$110,370
Mean salary
$123,900
Employment
44,010
Location quotient
1.25
Jobs per 1,000
7.3
COL-adjusted median
$110,416
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Management Analysts page for Illinois →

Related pages

Keep digging into management analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.