Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Material Moving Workers, All Other Salary: Minnesota vs Maine

Material Moving Workers, All Other earn a median of $53,750 in Minnesota and $58,410 in Maine. That is a nominal gap of $4,660 (-8.0%), with Maine paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$53,750
Minnesota median
$54,502 after COL
$58,410
Maine median
$60,185 after COL
-8.0%
Nominal gap
Maine leads
-9.4%
Adjusted gap
Maine leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maine pays $4,660 more per year than Minnesota for material moving workers, all other, a gap of +8.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maine still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,684 of extra purchasing power (+9.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for material moving workers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Material Moving Workers, All Other

Minnesota

Median salary
$53,750
Mean salary
$53,310
Employment
580
Location quotient
1.21
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$54,502
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Material Moving Workers, All Other page for Minnesota →

Material Moving Workers, All Other

Maine

Median salary
$58,410
Mean salary
$62,950
Employment
70
Location quotient
0.66
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$60,185
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Material Moving Workers, All Other page for Maine →

Related pages

Keep digging into material moving workers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.