Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Materials Engineers Salary: New Jersey vs Maryland

Materials Engineers earn a median of $100,240 in New Jersey and $130,920 in Maryland. That is a nominal gap of $30,680 (-23.4%), with Maryland paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$100,240
New Jersey median
$92,128 after COL
$130,920
Maryland median
$124,734 after COL
-23.4%
Nominal gap
Maryland leads
-26.1%
Adjusted gap
Maryland leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maryland pays $30,680 more per year than New Jersey for materials engineers, a gap of +23.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maryland still comes out ahead, with roughly $32,606 of extra purchasing power (+26.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for materials engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Materials Engineers

New Jersey

Median salary
$100,240
Mean salary
$110,400
Employment
290
Location quotient
0.45
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$92,128
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Materials Engineers page for New Jersey →

Materials Engineers

Maryland

Median salary
$130,920
Mean salary
$130,650
Employment
960
Location quotient
2.36
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$124,734
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Materials Engineers page for Maryland →

Related pages

Keep digging into materials engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.