Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Materials Engineers Salary: Tennessee vs California

Materials Engineers earn a median of $108,670 in Tennessee and $127,550 in California. That is a nominal gap of $18,880 (-14.8%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$108,670
Tennessee median
$118,287 after COL
$127,550
California median
$115,201 after COL
-14.8%
Nominal gap
California leads
+2.7%
Adjusted gap
Tennessee leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $18,880 more per year than Tennessee for materials engineers, a gap of +14.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Tennessee actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,086 more in national-price-level terms (a +2.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for materials engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Materials Engineers

Tennessee

Median salary
$108,670
Mean salary
$109,300
Employment
550
Location quotient
1.13
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$118,287
Regional Price Parity
91.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Materials Engineers page for Tennessee →

Materials Engineers

California

Median salary
$127,550
Mean salary
$131,080
Employment
2,760
Location quotient
1.03
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$115,201
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Materials Engineers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into materials engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.