Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Materials Scientists Salary: New Hampshire vs Illinois

Materials Scientists earn a median of $136,300 in New Hampshire and $120,320 in Illinois. That is a nominal gap of $15,980 (+13.3%), with New Hampshire paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$136,300
New Hampshire median
$130,850 after COL
$120,320
Illinois median
$120,371 after COL
+13.3%
Nominal gap
New Hampshire leads
+8.7%
Adjusted gap
New Hampshire leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Hampshire pays $15,980 more per year than Illinois for materials scientists, a gap of +13.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Hampshire still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,480 of extra purchasing power (+8.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for materials scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Materials Scientists

New Hampshire

Median salary
$136,300
Mean salary
$120,030
Employment
80
Location quotient
2.13
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$130,850
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Materials Scientists page for New Hampshire →

Materials Scientists

Illinois

Median salary
$120,320
Mean salary
$121,090
Employment
470
Location quotient
1.42
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$120,371
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Materials Scientists page for Illinois →

Related pages

Keep digging into materials scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.