Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Materials Scientists Salary: Oklahoma vs Florida

Materials Scientists earn a median of $115,840 in Oklahoma and $122,910 in Florida. That is a nominal gap of $7,070 (-5.8%), with Florida paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$115,840
Oklahoma median
$131,872 after COL
$122,910
Florida median
$118,852 after COL
-5.8%
Nominal gap
Florida leads
+11.0%
Adjusted gap
Oklahoma leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Florida pays $7,070 more per year than Oklahoma for materials scientists, a gap of +5.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Oklahoma actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $13,019 more in national-price-level terms (a +11.0% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for materials scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Materials Scientists

Oklahoma

Median salary
$115,840
Mean salary
$113,980
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.62
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$131,872
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Materials Scientists page for Oklahoma →

Materials Scientists

Florida

Median salary
$122,910
Mean salary
$116,390
Employment
100
Location quotient
0.19
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$118,852
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Materials Scientists page for Florida →

Related pages

Keep digging into materials scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.