Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Meter Readers, Utilities Salary: Connecticut vs California

Meter Readers, Utilities earn a median of $58,710 in Connecticut and $78,970 in California. That is a nominal gap of $20,260 (-25.7%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$58,710
Connecticut median
$56,664 after COL
$78,970
California median
$71,324 after COL
-25.7%
Nominal gap
California leads
-20.6%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $20,260 more per year than Connecticut for meter readers, utilities, a gap of +25.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $14,660 of extra purchasing power (+20.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for meter readers, utilities in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Meter Readers, Utilities

Connecticut

Median salary
$58,710
Mean salary
$61,310
Employment
110
Location quotient
0.50
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$56,664
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Meter Readers, Utilities page for Connecticut →

Meter Readers, Utilities

California

Median salary
$78,970
Mean salary
$78,570
Employment
890
Location quotient
0.39
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$71,324
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Meter Readers, Utilities page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into meter readers, utilities from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.