Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Millwrights Salary: Nevada vs Washington

Millwrights earn a median of $63,180 in Nevada and $76,300 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $13,120 (-17.2%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$63,180
Nevada median
$63,193 after COL
$76,300
Washington median
$71,300 after COL
-17.2%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-11.4%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $13,120 more per year than Nevada for millwrights, a gap of +17.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,106 of extra purchasing power (+11.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for millwrights in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Millwrights

Nevada

Median salary
$63,180
Mean salary
$72,300
Employment
130
Location quotient
0.32
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$63,193
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Millwrights page for Nevada →

Millwrights

Washington

Median salary
$76,300
Mean salary
$87,880
Employment
1,270
Location quotient
1.36
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$71,300
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Millwrights page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into millwrights from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.