Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Music Directors And Composers Salary: Mississippi vs Connecticut

Music Directors And Composers earn a median of $60,250 in Mississippi and $91,810 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $31,560 (-34.4%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$60,250
Mississippi median
$69,290 after COL
$91,810
Connecticut median
$88,611 after COL
-34.4%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-21.8%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $31,560 more per year than Mississippi for music directors and composers, a gap of +34.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $19,321 of extra purchasing power (+21.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for music directors and composers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Music Directors And Composers

Mississippi

Median salary
$60,250
Mean salary
$60,590
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.62
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$69,290
Regional Price Parity
87.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Music Directors And Composers page for Mississippi →

Music Directors And Composers

Connecticut

Median salary
$91,810
Mean salary
$115,500
Employment
150
Location quotient
1.08
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$88,611
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Music Directors And Composers page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into music directors and composers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.