Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Music Directors And Composers Salary: South Dakota vs Hawaii

Music Directors And Composers earn a median of $36,990 in South Dakota and $77,440 in Hawaii. That is a nominal gap of $40,450 (-52.2%), with Hawaii paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$36,990
South Dakota median
$41,756 after COL
$77,440
Hawaii median
$70,431 after COL
-52.2%
Nominal gap
Hawaii leads
-40.7%
Adjusted gap
Hawaii leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Hawaii pays $40,450 more per year than South Dakota for music directors and composers, a gap of +52.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Hawaii still comes out ahead, with roughly $28,675 of extra purchasing power (+40.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for music directors and composers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Music Directors And Composers

South Dakota

Median salary
$36,990
Mean salary
$36,460
Employment
40
Location quotient
1.17
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$41,756
Regional Price Parity
88.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Music Directors And Composers page for South Dakota →

Music Directors And Composers

Hawaii

Median salary
$77,440
Mean salary
$89,710
Employment
140
Location quotient
2.81
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$70,431
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Music Directors And Composers page for Hawaii →

Related pages

Keep digging into music directors and composers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.