Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Nurse Midwives Salary: Alaska vs Vermont

Nurse Midwives earn a median of $130,030 in Alaska and $140,240 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $10,210 (-7.3%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$130,030
Alaska median
$127,033 after COL
$140,240
Vermont median
$143,163 after COL
-7.3%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
-11.3%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $10,210 more per year than Alaska for nurse midwives, a gap of +7.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $16,130 of extra purchasing power (+11.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for nurse midwives in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Nurse Midwives

Alaska

Median salary
$130,030
Mean salary
$137,410
Employment
60
Location quotient
3.24
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$127,033
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Midwives page for Alaska →

Nurse Midwives

Vermont

Median salary
$140,240
Mean salary
$138,410
Employment
40
Location quotient
2.47
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$143,163
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Midwives page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into nurse midwives from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.