Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Nurse Practitioners Salary: Oregon vs Alaska

Nurse Practitioners earn a median of $144,600 in Oregon and $145,450 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $850 (-0.6%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$144,600
Oregon median
$139,898 after COL
$145,450
Alaska median
$142,098 after COL
-0.6%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-1.5%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $850 more per year than Oregon for nurse practitioners, a gap of +0.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,200 of extra purchasing power (+1.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for nurse practitioners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Nurse Practitioners

Oregon

Median salary
$144,600
Mean salary
$148,030
Employment
2,430
Location quotient
0.62
Jobs per 1,000
1.2
COL-adjusted median
$139,898
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Practitioners page for Oregon →

Nurse Practitioners

Alaska

Median salary
$145,450
Mean salary
$142,340
Employment
570
Location quotient
0.89
Jobs per 1,000
1.8
COL-adjusted median
$142,098
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Practitioners page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into nurse practitioners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.