Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Nurse Practitioners Salary: Providence-Warwick, RI-MA vs Salinas, CA

Nurse Practitioners earn a median of $130,640 in Providence-Warwick, RI-MA and $168,270 in Salinas, CA. That is a nominal gap of $37,630 (-22.4%), with Salinas, CA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$130,640
Providence-Warwick, RI-MA median
$128,364 after COL
$168,270
Salinas, CA median
$154,317 after COL
-22.4%
Nominal gap
Salinas, CA leads
-16.8%
Adjusted gap
Salinas, CA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Salinas, CA pays $37,630 more per year than Providence-Warwick, RI-MA for nurse practitioners, a gap of +22.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Salinas, CA still comes out ahead, with roughly $25,953 of extra purchasing power (+16.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for nurse practitioners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Nurse Practitioners

Providence-Warwick, RI-MA

Median salary
$130,640
Mean salary
$138,090
Employment
1,490
Location quotient
1.05
Jobs per 1,000
2.1
COL-adjusted median
$128,364
Regional Price Parity
101.8%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Nurse Practitioners page for Providence-Warwick, RI-MA →

Nurse Practitioners

Salinas, CA

Median salary
$168,270
Mean salary
$167,400
Employment
140
Location quotient
0.36
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$154,317
Regional Price Parity
109.0%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Nurse Practitioners page for Salinas, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into nurse practitioners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.