Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Nurse Practitioners Salary: Texas vs Washington

Nurse Practitioners earn a median of $129,880 in Texas and $140,220 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $10,340 (-7.4%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$129,880
Texas median
$133,818 after COL
$140,220
Washington median
$131,031 after COL
-7.4%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+2.1%
Adjusted gap
Texas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $10,340 more per year than Texas for nurse practitioners, a gap of +7.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Texas actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,787 more in national-price-level terms (a +2.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for nurse practitioners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Nurse Practitioners

Texas

Median salary
$129,880
Mean salary
$130,930
Employment
21,690
Location quotient
0.79
Jobs per 1,000
1.6
COL-adjusted median
$133,818
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Practitioners page for Texas →

Nurse Practitioners

Washington

Median salary
$140,220
Mean salary
$143,620
Employment
4,790
Location quotient
0.68
Jobs per 1,000
1.4
COL-adjusted median
$131,031
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Practitioners page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into nurse practitioners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.