Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Occupational Therapists Salary: Pennsylvania vs Nevada

Occupational Therapists earn a median of $94,120 in Pennsylvania and $104,770 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $10,650 (-10.2%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$94,120
Pennsylvania median
$96,462 after COL
$104,770
Nevada median
$104,792 after COL
-10.2%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-7.9%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $10,650 more per year than Pennsylvania for occupational therapists, a gap of +10.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Nevada still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,330 of extra purchasing power (+7.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for occupational therapists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Occupational Therapists

Pennsylvania

Median salary
$94,120
Mean salary
$93,950
Employment
7,200
Location quotient
1.21
Jobs per 1,000
1.2
COL-adjusted median
$96,462
Regional Price Parity
97.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Occupational Therapists page for Pennsylvania →

Occupational Therapists

Nevada

Median salary
$104,770
Mean salary
$110,320
Employment
1,090
Location quotient
0.72
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$104,792
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Occupational Therapists page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into occupational therapists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.