Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Occupational Therapy Assistants Salary: Nevada vs Arizona

Occupational Therapy Assistants earn a median of $76,450 in Nevada and $75,020 in Arizona. That is a nominal gap of $1,430 (+1.9%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$76,450
Nevada median
$76,466 after COL
$75,020
Arizona median
$74,516 after COL
+1.9%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
+2.6%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $1,430 more per year than Arizona for occupational therapy assistants, a gap of +1.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Nevada still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,951 of extra purchasing power (+2.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for occupational therapy assistants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Occupational Therapy Assistants

Nevada

Median salary
$76,450
Mean salary
$75,520
Employment
190
Location quotient
0.40
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$76,466
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Occupational Therapy Assistants page for Nevada →

Occupational Therapy Assistants

Arizona

Median salary
$75,020
Mean salary
$73,360
Employment
930
Location quotient
0.94
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$74,516
Regional Price Parity
100.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Occupational Therapy Assistants page for Arizona →

Related pages

Keep digging into occupational therapy assistants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.